AIRanks
Disclosure: AIRanks is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click affiliate links — this never influences our editorial scoring or rankings. Learn more
Side-by-Side Comparison

Atlas VPNvsPureVPN

Product A

Atlas VPN

by Nord Security

Budget VPN by Nord Security with unlimited simultaneous connections and a usable free tier.

Free tier
Visit Atlas VPN
Product B

PureVPN

by GZ Systems Ltd.

Feature-rich VPN with 6,500+ servers, port forwarding, and dedicated IP options.

$2.14mo
View PureVPN

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureAtlas VPNPureVPN
Price
FreeBetter
$2.14mo
Free TierYesNo
Top ProsVery affordable long-term plansBest Asia-Pacific server coverage
Unlimited simultaneous devicesPort forwarding rare in VPN market
WireGuard protocolVery competitive long-term pricing
Top ConsSmaller server network than NordVPNPast logging controversy lingers
Free tier is very limitedApp quality lags behind NordVPN

Features Compared

Atlas VPN and PureVPN take distinctly different approaches to feature sets, reflecting their positioning in the market. Atlas VPN, built by Nord Security, prioritizes simplicity and modern encryption with WireGuard and IKEv2 protocol support, alongside SafeSwap rotating IPs that shift your address periodically for enhanced anonymity. It also includes a data breach monitor and kill switch functionality. A standout differentiator is unlimited simultaneous device connections, making it ideal for users managing multiple gadgets without juggling disconnections. However, Atlas VPN operates from a smaller server network than competitors and offers fewer advanced features overall.

PureVPN, operated by GZ Systems Ltd., takes the opposite path with a robust, feature-laden offering. It boasts 6,500+ servers across 78 countries, with particular strength in Asia-Pacific coverage. Most notably, PureVPN includes port forwarding functionality—a capability rare in the VPN market—alongside dedicated IP options for those needing static addresses. The service also provides split tunnelling to route only specific traffic through the VPN, and its no-logs policy has been audited by KPMG, adding a credibility layer often absent in the industry. The trade-off is that PureVPN's app quality lags behind competitors like NordVPN, and the interface can feel less polished during everyday use.

Pricing & Value

Budget-conscious users will find Atlas VPN and PureVPN competing fiercely on cost. Atlas VPN stands out with a free tier available, making it a zero-risk entry point for those testing VPN benefits, though the free tier is notably limited in scope. PureVPN prices at $2.14 per month, which represents very competitive long-term value, particularly for users committing to annual or multi-year plans. The real decision hinges on what you're paying for: Atlas VPN's affordability combined with unlimited simultaneous connections offers exceptional ROI for multi-device households, while PureVPN's aggressive pricing rewards commitment to longer subscription terms and justifies upsells like dedicated IPs for power users.

  • Atlas VPN: Free tier available; very affordable long-term plans; no per-month cost disclosed for paid tier in baseline data
  • PureVPN: $2.14/month; highly competitive on long-term pricing; dedicated IP and port forwarding available as paid add-ons
  • Atlas VPN better for experimentation; PureVPN better for committed users seeking lowest per-month cost
  • Neither carries prohibitive pricing, making both accessible to budget-limited users

Ease of Use & Onboarding

Atlas VPN prioritizes simplicity by design. Built on Nord Security's expertise, it delivers a streamlined experience with fewer advanced settings to overwhelm new users. The unlimited device connections also mean less friction during setup across phones, tablets, and computers. Conversely, PureVPN's feature richness introduces complexity: port forwarding, split tunnelling, and dedicated IP management require more technical familiarity. Users comfortable tweaking network settings will appreciate the depth; those seeking plug-and-play convenience may find the interface intimidating. Atlas VPN suits onboarding-focused teams and non-technical users, while PureVPN rewards power users willing to invest learning time.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both VPNs function as standalone tools with limited ecosystem integration. Atlas VPN's position under the Nord Security umbrella suggests potential synergies with other Nord products, though this integration is not detailed in the provided data. PureVPN's port forwarding and split tunnelling capabilities position it better for users integrating VPN services with custom networking setups, self-hosted applications, or advanced routing scenarios. Neither product is marketed as part of a broader platform or suite, meaning integration success depends largely on standard VPN protocol compatibility and the user's ability to configure their own network stack. For most users, ecosystem gaps are negligible; for network architects, PureVPN's advanced features offer more integration leverage.

Who Should Choose Atlas VPN?

Atlas VPN is the clear winner for budget-conscious individuals and families managing multiple devices. If you own a smartphone, tablet, laptop, and smart TV—all of which need simultaneous VPN protection—Atlas VPN's unlimited connections eliminate the device-juggling problem that plagues competitors. The free tier also makes it perfect for users evaluating VPN viability before spending money. Remote workers and students with tight budgets, especially those in regions served adequately by smaller server networks, will find excellent value. Atlas VPN excels when simplicity, affordability, and multi-device support outweigh the need for advanced features like port forwarding or massive global server choice.

Who Should Choose PureVPN?

PureVPN targets users who need advanced networking capabilities or serve geographically diverse audiences, particularly in Asia-Pacific regions where its server coverage shines. IT professionals and developers benefit from port forwarding for self-hosted services, while organizations requiring dedicated IPs for email deliverability or application whitelisting will find this add-on invaluable. The KPMG-audited no-logs policy appeals to security-conscious professionals and journalists who demand third-party verification of privacy claims. Users willing to tolerate a less polished interface for competitive pricing, robust features, and superior Asia-Pacific access should choose PureVPN. It's the product for those saying, "I need specific advanced capabilities and don't mind a steeper learning curve."

Choose Atlas VPN if you…
  • Want: very affordable long-term plans
  • Want: unlimited simultaneous devices
  • Want: wireguard protocol
Try Atlas VPN
Choose PureVPN if you…
  • Want: best asia-pacific server coverage
  • Want: port forwarding rare in vpn market
  • Want: very competitive long-term pricing
View PureVPN